Frames have always played a supporting role in the
cast of star-studded artworks, but they've recently found themselves
in the spotlight. Some of today's most appreciated antique frames
could be found in the trash heap only a few decades ago. But in this
rags-to-riches tale, a handful of dealers, curators, and collectors came to
their senses sometime in the 1980s and realized the value of displaying
works in frames that were their equals, their contemporaries, or even
perhaps their influences.
Mark Methner, director of McColl Fine Art in
Charlotte, is one of the players who feel passionately about preserving and
appreciating period frames. "There's a real desire today to
frame much more academically," he says. Methner selects antique
frames for the gallery's inventory of paintings from a variety of
sources, including auctions, dealers, and the gallery's own inventory
of frames. It's a little like finding the maiden that fits the
slipper. This scholarly matchmaker has an artist's eye for aesthetics
and an art historian's eye for context, carefully juggling
considerations of period, aesthetics, and various treatments for differing styles.
Methner framed two still lifes by Danish artist Emil
Carlsen, who was influenced by renowned still life artist
Jean-Baptiste-Siméon Chardin, with two very different approaches.
For the first, a very Chardinesque work, he chose a muted and rusticated
antique French frame from the late 17th century, as a work by Chardin might
be framed, referring to both the period and aesthetic of influence.
For the
second, he chose a bold, Dutch-style, ebonized frame from the 19th century,
a dramatic treatment that illuminates the work, which appeared washed out
by its previous presentation in a gilt frame. "I want people to be
able to see paintings in their best possible light," he says.
"You discount the potential of a painting when it's in an
inappropriate frame."
Works of art often get reframed when they change
hands, sporting the new collector's taste. But disregarding the
context of the work disconnects it from its time. "It's like
wearing the right dress with the wrong shoes," says David Park Curry,
curator of American arts at the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts. In 2001, the
museum was engaged in a major reframing project, spending a quarter of a
million dollars to reframe its collection of American paintings.
"Seeing a work of art as it's intended to be seen -- it's
had a huge impact on the collection. Now 35 paintings are singing a
song," Curry says.